It’s hard for me to imagine wanting a job where you go around knocking on strangers’ doors and asking if they have a mental illness–or maybe two or three.
But that’s precisely what researchers in the National Comorbidity Survey by Harvard University, the very first large-scale study of the prevalence of mental illness in the United States, did.
“Hi. I’m from Harvard. Have you ever suffered from bipolar disorder?” is how I imagine the conversation going, but the researchers got a lot of useful data, so perhaps they were more adept than I would be at feeling out the answers.
These conversations first occurred between the fall of 1990 to the spring of 1992 as the National Comorbidity Survey (NCS) did, in their words, ”the first nationally representative mental health survey in the U.S. to use a fully structured research diagnostic interview to assess the prevalences and correlates of DSM-III-R [Diagnostics and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders] disorders.”
And apparently it was such a big hit–that they did it again. Same questions, different year. The National Comorbidity Study Replication Study (NCS-R) took place between February 2001 and April 2003, when 9,282 interviews were conducted, this time using criteria from the DSM-IV. Aside from lifetime prevalencee of mental disorders, the study determined 12-month prevalence, or the percentage of participants who identified symptoms in the 12 months leading up to the interview. ["Hi. I'm from Harvard. Have you been drinking heavily this past year?" I guess is how that might play out.]
And since I promised you yesterday less talk and more visual, this is what I have to show for myself about the frequency of the occurrence of mental disorders from the NCS-R, occurring within a year of the interview:

ManicMuses
July 27, 2012
If the numbers were to include the homeless and those in institutions I have no doubt we would see the overall prevalence of any disorder percentage spike in the high 30 percentile (dare I even say the low 40′s?)
This is a fabulous infographic. Thanks for sharing!
candidaabrahamson
July 27, 2012
Thanks for your kind words–and you are absolutely right. The numbers–which are not too low to start with–would turn out to be astonishingly low had they included two very relevant excluded groups. It’s a pity they didn’t really.
Kimberly McPherson
September 5, 2012
You rock my friend! I always love your posts. Especially the ones with the info-graphics and pictures. I am going to reblog this one for sure. I’m positive it won’t be the last time I do! Just love what you do and think you can explain things in a manner that not many can. You go girl!
Love,
Kimmy
Rhona Finkel (@Abitofthisand)
September 5, 2012
So very, very glad you get a lot out of my posts. It makes it all worthwhile. Re-blog away, to your heart’s content!
Best,
Rhona
Kimberly McPherson
September 5, 2012
Reblogged this on Kimberly McPherson's Blog and commented:
A totally BA post by Rhona Finkel. This woman knows her stuff and can explain things in a manner that all of us can comprehend. That is something to be proud of. You go Rhona!
Love Always,
Kimmy
http://www.withoutalabel.me