Twitter has its fingers on the pulse of the nation, on the ‘what’s-hot-what’s-not’ ongoings in the world of the web.
So, using visual.ly’s software, I checked out how frequently the hashtag ‘#mentalillness’ occurred on Twitter in the past month.

create infographics with visual.ly
The numbers seemed low to me–alarmingly low, given the depth and breadth of the problem with mental illness in this country, and beyond.
So I went and checked out one of the very few pop stars I happen to have heard of, none other than Ms. Miley Cyrus (born in 1992, as if that should be allowed). For those of you, like me, who hardly have a clue about modern-day pop icons, and haven’t since the Rolling Stones rolled into town, Ms. Cyrus is an American actress and pop singer, and achieved inordinate fame for acting in a Disney Channel show called Hannah Montana. [Is that more than you needed to know?]
My worst suspicions about where our priorities are as a society were confirmed, as you’ll see in the Life of #MileyCyrus below:

create infographics with visual.ly
So, to get this perfectly straight, #mentalillness had 226 appearances on its peak day in the past month, and 3532 appearances overall.
I guess it sounds kind of alright.
Until you realize that #MileyCyrus received 865 appearances on her peak day, and–ready for this?–16,108 appearances overall in the past month.
Usually I have a lot to say about topics, and can get myself worked up enough to spout some pretty lengthy verbiage.
Here. . .the numbers have silenced me.
But when I start to wonder why it’s so difficult to get insurance coverage for mental health issues, I can remind myself that we as a society are vastly much more interested in Miley Cyrus than in the plight of the mentally ill. Well over 4 and a half times more interested, in the past month alone.
You’d more quickly get coverage for a Miley Cyrus obsession than you would for maintenance treatment for bipolar disorder.
It doesn’t make me feel proud. (Although Ms. Cyrus’s parents must be glowing. And who could blame them?)
I’m off to write a brilliant tweet with the hasthag #mentalillness. If I keep it up at a steady rate, and Ms. Cyrus’s fame eventually wanes, the numbers of hasthags both receive might even out in, say, 2089. I’ll keep you posted.
theartistryofthebipolarbrain
July 25, 2012
My only addition would be adding #bipolar, #schizophrenia, etc. might add more perspective. Maybe?
candidaabrahamson
July 25, 2012
That is a helpful and excellent enough comment that it deserves a post of its own. To be continued. . .
candidaabrahamson
July 25, 2012
Done–and compared with physical illnesses. Not a good situation, as you can see in the post.
lizziecracked
July 25, 2012
Yes that was what I was thinking too… I wonder if the numbers would be better.. or how much different. Good information though and a bit …sad.
candidaabrahamson
July 25, 2012
Thanks, Lizzie. That was such a good thought that I did re-run it, in a post I just published, with the specific mental illnesses compared to physical illnesses. I don’t think you’ll be surprised at what gets more ‘play time’. . .
NZ Cate
July 27, 2012
It would be interesting to compare this to say Facebook. My guess is that a different type of person uses FB rather than Twitter, but then I am only new to Twitter myself and maybe don’t know what I’m talking about. Always a possibility.
candidaabrahamson
July 27, 2012
Now that’s quite a fascinating possibility as well. Shameful as this is, I have never used FB, so it never really occurred to me to do, but just out of curiosity I’m going to see what visual.ly offers in that arena, and will get back to you if I find something. You guys are quite thoughtful and creative in response to graphics!
candidaabrahamson
July 27, 2012
Aha. With no FB access, I can’t run any stats on it. My loss–but do let me know if you come up with something.
NZ Cate
July 27, 2012
I use FB a lot but I have no idea how to come up with those stats. Sorry. I think the term for me is technically challenged but I am sure that FB attracts a different market than Twitter.